Re: MBNA

by **ceylon** » Mon May 16, 2011 12:04 am

do you have a bank account? or is it your fiction? therefore fiction and yes autograph it By: autograph

by **Advertising** » Mon May 16, 2011 12:15 am

by **judgesprocket** » Mon May 16, 2011 12:15 am

ceylon wrote:do you have a bank account? or is it your fiction? therefore fiction and yes autograph it By: autograph

Thanks Ceylon

by **Advertising** » Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:47 pm

by **judgesprocket** » Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:47 pm

Well MBNA are doing everything they can to avoid an Estoppel being served on them. I received a letter from them earlier in the week reminding my person that monies are outstanding. I received a phone call yesterday from them which lasted around 45 seconds as they hung up when they realised they couldnt confirm who they were talking to on the phone and I certainly wasnt going to volunteer anything and this morning my person receieved a default notice. I feel another Bill comming on I think.

All I can say is this. They aint getting a bean from me unless they are prepared to address the notices as served. If they don't like it well thats their problem init!

by **judgesprocket** » Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:03 pm

Hmmm...been sitting here thinking about tacit agreement with MBNA. I am wondering if I have accidentally broken the agreement by sending them a letter returning a statement they issued. I wrote the letter between sending Notices 2 & 3 and it was delivered to MBNA prior to the 10 day period of reply elapsing with Notice 3 thus tacit was not in affect at that point. Wondering if I should resend all the Notices again as a result though incase I have made a boob!!. What does the panel think?

by **GANGSHIELD** » Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:05 pm

Start again go for it, stick to the time table, do not write to them other than the letters! :!:

by **judgesprocket** » Fri Jun 10, 2011 11:35 pm

GANGSHIELD wrote:Start again go for it, stick to the time table, do not write to them other than the letters!

Bollocks! I knew it

. I have not used the standard templates available on the website. I have used part of the content from the letters though along with input from others sources to create what I feel are fairly beefy Notices. I have just realised I have used the word "disputed" on the 1st and 2nd Notice not realising that this could give ground to a court case! I just "fell over" this concept looking through some of the threads in the last hour or so. I am seriously thinking of binning the current Notices and just using the letters from the main website instead which is probably what I should have done in the first place. Bugger!!

by **johnmills1962** » Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:27 am

true enough, you're conditionally accepting that you're as guilty as a puppy next to a pile of poo

on proof of claim

by **GANGSHIELD** » Sat Jun 11, 2011 1:42 pm

judgesprocket wrote:
GANGSHIELD wrote:Start again go for it, stick to the time table, do not write to them other than the letters!

Bollocks! I knew it . I have not used the standard templates available on the website. I have used part of the content from the letters though along with input from others sources to create what I feel are fairly beefy Notices. I have just realised I have used the word "disputed" on the 1st and 2nd Notice not realising that this could give ground to a court case! I just "fell over" this concept looking through some of the threads in the last hour or so. I am seriously thinking of binning the current Notices and just using the letters from the main website instead which is probably what I should have done in the first place. Bugger!!

Use the 3 letters on this system by starting again - no problem, ignore previous mistakes.

by **judgesprocket** » Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:46 pm

Thanks for the support guys. 4 Notices from main website ready to go along with UA's. Hopefully there will be no mistooks this time!!

by **judgesprocket** » Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:47 pm

Just a couple of quick question on the 1st Notice template available from the main website:

"2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed invoice in accordance with Bills of Exchange Act (1882) );"

Should the above be : 2. Verification of your claim against me (a sworn affidavit or a hand signed Bill in accordance with Bills of Exchange Act (1882) );

and

"Yours sincerely
By: < Your Signature >
By: Sovereign ©Joe-John: Doe; Authorised Representative"

Does the word "Sovereign" have to be on the notice??

Who is online