METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Moderators: getoutofdebtfree, againstthesystem, davidlloyd, ceylon, gem78

METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby faircop » Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:28 pm

Further to my previous posts regarding HSBC, they have now passed this on to METROPOLITAN Collection Services Limited. I have sent them Standard Letter 1 and this is their response (see attached). I assume that because they have not addressed the points raised in Standard Letter 1 I continue and send Standard Letter 2 when 10 days is up?

Can they really apply for an "Attachment of Earnings order" and approach my employer to deduct money from my wages? Surely it's up to me if I want to be in debt (which I don't) and has got nothing to do with my employer, that is just like an extra tax (MET Tax).

Any advice will be greatly appreciated.

f.
Attachments
img017 -1.jpg
Letter from METROPOLITAN Collection Services Limited.
faircop
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:42 pm

by Advertising » Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:19 pm

Advertising
 

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby polo126 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:19 pm

I would carry on with letter two and three get them in tacit, the rest is down to the fear factor they cannot go for an attachment of earnings before taking you to court, they just want you to shutup and pay, once you get to letter three start to bill them.
Do you have HSBC in tacit if so bill them :)
PER ARDUA AD ALTA
polo126
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:00 am

by Advertising » Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:54 pm

Advertising
 

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby faircop » Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:54 pm

polo126 wrote:I would carry on with letter two and three get them in tacit, the rest is down to the fear factor they cannot go for an attachment of earnings before taking you to court, they just want you to shutup and pay, once you get to letter three start to bill them.
Do you have HSBC in tacit if so bill them :)


Cheers, just a bit of a sanity check. Yes, I have got HSBC in tacit; bill them for METROPOLITAN's correspondence? or just for any correspondence from HSBC since the 3 letters, as per the charge structure in the 3 letters?

So, court is where it is heading? Is that likely? Obviously, I want to avoid court if I can.

f.
faircop
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:42 pm

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby guardianofwithinaolcom » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:18 pm

If you have HSBC in tacit and they then passed the alleged debt to a third party, then in my book they breached the tacit agreement. The letters state if they pass on the debt to another party then HSBC will be billed for the transgression.
I am the wind that rustles the leaves, I am the heat from the Sun, I am the waves that crash to the shore, I am ME, The Guardian.

As much as I adore Nature, feel part of Nature and at peace with Nature, I still dislike Bull_Sh*t.
guardianofwithinaolcom
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:24 am
Location: Bath

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby faircop » Wed Mar 28, 2012 11:35 pm

guardianofwithinaolcom wrote:If you have HSBC in tacit and they then passed the alleged debt to a third party, then in my book they breached the tacit agreement. The letters state if they pass on the debt to another party then HSBC will be billed for the transgression.


Nice one, cheers.

f.
faircop
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:42 pm

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby guardianofwithinaolcom » Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:31 pm

Also I notice that you have been given a Bank Giro Credit form with the letter you received. I guess You could always fill it out and A4V it sending a covering letter of instructions for the Chief Financial officer of HSBC/Metropolitan Collections to be reimbursed from your STRAWMAN account. After all I have been led to believe that a Bank Giro Credit form is the same as a cheque. I may have this totally wrong as I have not yet gone down the A4V route.
There are a number of threads regarding A4V on this site and also at TPUC.org. I am sure that if any other members are already using the A4V system they will be able to advise you far better than I can. I have only been a member here for just over a year now, So I am pretty much a novice at this.

Please dont just take my word for it, research the subject so you know what you are doing.

Best regards from Dave.
I am the wind that rustles the leaves, I am the heat from the Sun, I am the waves that crash to the shore, I am ME, The Guardian.

As much as I adore Nature, feel part of Nature and at peace with Nature, I still dislike Bull_Sh*t.
guardianofwithinaolcom
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Posts: 1034
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:24 am
Location: Bath

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby faircop » Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:20 pm

guardianofwithinaolcom wrote:Also I notice that you have been given a Bank Giro Credit form with the letter you received. I guess You could always fill it out and A4V it sending a covering letter of instructions for the Chief Financial officer of HSBC/Metropolitan Collections to be reimbursed from your STRAWMAN account. After all I have been led to believe that a Bank Giro Credit form is the same as a cheque. I may have this totally wrong as I have not yet gone down the A4V route.
There are a number of threads regarding A4V on this site and also at TPUC.org. I am sure that if any other members are already using the A4V system they will be able to advise you far better than I can. I have only been a member here for just over a year now, So I am pretty much a novice at this.

Please dont just take my word for it, research the subject so you know what you are doing.

Best regards from Dave.


Awesome! I will definitely research that. Thank you very much indeed.

f.
faircop
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:42 pm

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby redmakka » Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:02 pm

From something I have seen, I believe its against the law for a debt collector to let your business known to others, even family. Its like breaking the data protection. They are trying to scare you.
redmakka
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Posts: 682
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:00 am

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby polo126 » Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:33 pm

Bill HSBC, carry on with letters to metropolitan if they do pass your details to others you can take them to task for braking data protection rules and harrassment.
PER ARDUA AD ALTA
polo126
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 1:00 am

Re: METROPOLITAN's response to Standard Letter 1.

Postby faircop » Thu Mar 29, 2012 11:14 pm

Thank you redmakka and polo126. Your advice is greatly appreciated.

f.
faircop
Silver Member
Silver Member
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 3:42 pm

Next

Return to Metropolitan

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest