I've since found out that even though this particular class of criminal (lawyer) doesn't take an oath of office as such (other than the oath they presumably make in court) they can be efectively barred from practising 'law' if their names are removed from a register of authorised people. I incorporated this (in a fashion) into a notice I sent to Cabot in their latest criminal endeavours with me.Cabot Financial Notice
They'll only have received it today so I'm waiting for the fur to fly. I know they won't like it because I based my argument on logic and morality, something these parasites, Cabot and other DCA's lack. I was tempted to say that any legal professional who tried to defend their case if they provide no proof will have a forced career change where they'll most likely be required to use the phrase: "Do you want fries with that?"
Do let me know if any of you have any luck in getting one barred
Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.