Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

by **faircop** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:22 pm

ceylon wrote:number one should be 3 times what they were chasing you for

Ok, that's number 2. I'll get rid of my number 1 in that case.

Thank you,

f.

by **Advertising** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:53 pm

by **guardianofwithinaolcom** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:53 pm

Are you sure you have only spent a total of one hour dealing with this bank since you started? how many letters have you written? how many have they sent you, each one is sent or received on a different day and so if you charge £1,000 per hour or part of then you need to rack up the figure. : After all the word nunc per tunk means now from then so that means from the beginning

by **Advertising** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:46 pm

by **faircop** » Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:46 pm

guardianofwithinaolcom wrote:Are you sure you have only spent a total of one hour dealing with this bank since you started? how many letters have you written? how many have they sent you, each one is sent or received on a different day and so if you charge £1,000 per hour or part of then you need to rack up the figure. : After all the word nunc per tunk means now from then so that means from the beginning

Nice 1, cheers! Yeah, I am trying to get to grips with the latin and legalese lingo. It's all a bit of a learning curve at the moment...

Thank you,

f.

by **faircop** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:58 pm

First Bill sent 05 April 2012...

Second Bill due to be sent tomorrow (a bit behind).

Received the attached letter from Barclays shortly after, dated 06 April 2012.

f.

by **polo126** » Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:20 pm

Bill them again

by **faircop** » Tue May 01, 2012 9:46 pm

Still haven't received a cheque from Barclays despite billing them twice, although they have written to me (on 6/4/12) saying that I have informed them that I am receiving 3rd party debt advice (I haven't informed them of anything of the sort). Do I bill them again and keep racking up the charges or make a claim? I haven't been able to send the estoppel to them yet as I have not had 30 clear days of no contact (are they deliberately preventing me from sending the estoppel?).

Any advice?

f.

by **ceylon** » Tue May 01, 2012 11:21 pm

ignore this one and see what happens

by **faircop** » Wed May 02, 2012 6:57 pm

ceylon wrote:ignore this one and see what happens

Ok, will do. Then i can send the estoppel on 6/5.

Cheers,

f.

by **ceylon** » Wed May 02, 2012 7:30 pm

no you cant it has to be 30 days with no contact

by **faircop** » Wed May 02, 2012 8:34 pm

ceylon wrote:no you cant it has to be 30 days with no contact

Exactly, 06/05 is 30 days from 06/04... ?

f.

Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Re: Barclays' response to the 3 Standard Letters.

Who is online